O
Sutter County
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Project #U24-0017 (Singh) rezone

Sutter County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (2)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 16, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveSarbjit SinghApr 16, 2026

Property owner said the family has no plans for a truck terminal and wants a parts store with tenants already lined up, bringing revenue and jobs to Sutter County.

Planning Commission - Regular — April 16, 2026 · 12:37 →
SupportiveJim WhitakerApr 16, 2026

Former supervisor and consultant said the applicant has followed every rule, noted truck yards were ironically allowed across the highway, and voiced full support for the commercial project.

Planning Commission - Regular — April 16, 2026 · 13:36 →
SupportiveEamon DodwaltApr 16, 2026

Echoed that there will be no truck yards, said the parts-retail use fits the 99 corridor near Barry School and would bring the county revenue and jobs.

Planning Commission - Regular — April 16, 2026 · 14:32 →
OpposedManjit BungalApr 16, 2026

Longtime area resident opposed to industrial zoning, citing the applicant's past notices of violation and lawsuit, truck yards creeping into her neighborhood, and traffic and fumes near Barry School where her grandchildren attend.

Planning Commission - Regular — April 16, 2026 · 15:32 →
ConcernedSukvinder BungalApr 16, 2026

Neighborhood resident would support the project if a no-truck-yard condition were in writing, recalling a bitter fight to remove a past truck yard and concerns about a retention pond next to the school playground.

Planning Commission - Regular — April 16, 2026 · 19:02 →
OpposedJamie McBrideApr 16, 2026

Nearby mother of two Barry School students opposed the project, citing dangerous Walnut Avenue/Highway 99 traffic, a deteriorating road serving the school, and safety concerns for children walking to school.

Planning Commission - Regular — April 16, 2026 · 22:16 →